Still more ink!

**Rocky** · August 28th, 2005, 10:29 AM

no offense and i love everyones artistic flare with tats, but does it not look like a little much having one on each of your calves? I am not putting you down in any way i hope you realize that, was you not worried about the overkill on that and how does it actually look now? thanks. I am waiting on my next tat and i dont know where to get it from/at or what i want yet.

**imported_elp6n** · August 28th, 2005, 11:01 AM

The way I see it, that area can be shown if you want, covered if you don't.
I think getting them on the hands/neck is probably the least attractive of all places.

**steer** · August 28th, 2005, 11:13 AM

yeah I've got one on my calf. I will admit, I kinda wish I didn't have it. But i love all my tattoo's. haha.

I mean, some days I'm in the mood to show it off, so I wear shorts, then other days I'll wear pants. If that made any sense to anybody. haha...
and plus if people really like, or wanna get to know ya, they wont care whats on the outside.. [img]/LDPforum/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

**Unchained** · August 28th, 2005, 11:14 AM

No offense taken man. With tats, it's all about personal choice. I agree totally with elp6n: They would be issuing winter storm warnings on the hottest side of hell before I would have a tat on my hands or neck. Papa Mike tells me all of the time that out of his over 100 tats, the ones he regrets are the ones on his hands. BTW Craes: Tell the old man that his tat is pretty sharp. I have been complimented several times on the calf tats, so I can handle a little questioning. The ?s far underweigh the compliments. It wouldn't matter to me a bit if it was the reverse. They weren't purchased with popularity in mind. 5 out of the 6 are direct statements,tributes...etc. Only the Panther one was a just for the hell of it.